Junior Walker and the Allstars: Roadrunner
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
West Ham and Millwall to be Punished
It has been announced that he FA will make known to the public their decision regarding how to punish West Ham and Millwall as a result of the violence at Upton Park.
Their findings come at the conclusion of an investigation launched in response to the rioting and pitch invasions that occurred during the Carling Cup match at Upton Park in August.
Rumor has it that the FA will be making example of my team as well as of Millwall, which means there will be stiff fines other extreme measures taken.
There is a concern in England that things could get out of hand and return to how it used to be - violent and dangerous. There is also concern that such behavior will compromise attempts to be selected for the chance to host a variety of international sporting events. However, the idea that this was such an extraordinary event is silly at best. Football violence has never completely disappeared, and many hundreds of arrests aremade each year. It is also worth noting that many other teams have a worse reputation for trouble these days than West Ham, although one might argue that Millwalls reputation is not far off from the truth.
I am biased, so of course I feel like we're being singled out. I also think punishing the club with stiff fines and point deductions won't really hurt the supporters responsible for the chaos. (We don't yet know what the punishment will be, but point deductions will really hurt us.) It is sad when supporters get out of hand, but it would be sadder still if the FA decided to dole out symbolic punishments, regardless of how ineffective they are.
Their findings come at the conclusion of an investigation launched in response to the rioting and pitch invasions that occurred during the Carling Cup match at Upton Park in August.
Rumor has it that the FA will be making example of my team as well as of Millwall, which means there will be stiff fines other extreme measures taken.
There is a concern in England that things could get out of hand and return to how it used to be - violent and dangerous. There is also concern that such behavior will compromise attempts to be selected for the chance to host a variety of international sporting events. However, the idea that this was such an extraordinary event is silly at best. Football violence has never completely disappeared, and many hundreds of arrests aremade each year. It is also worth noting that many other teams have a worse reputation for trouble these days than West Ham, although one might argue that Millwalls reputation is not far off from the truth.
I am biased, so of course I feel like we're being singled out. I also think punishing the club with stiff fines and point deductions won't really hurt the supporters responsible for the chaos. (We don't yet know what the punishment will be, but point deductions will really hurt us.) It is sad when supporters get out of hand, but it would be sadder still if the FA decided to dole out symbolic punishments, regardless of how ineffective they are.
Monday, September 21, 2009
From Derby to Travesty
Sundays Manchester Derby highlights a lot of what aggravates me about football. Allow me to explain.
This was a game worth waking up for. Man U have a long history and are attempting to capture yet another championship under Sir Alex Ferguson. Man City are a recently wealthy team who have been acquiring great players and working their way towards the top four. Naturally, as rivals from the same city, you could imagine how much this game meant to both sides.
But of course, the entire match became a spectacle. It must be said though, that this began weeks ago when the managers of both teams began exchanging barbs. Sir Alex, as we've all come to expect, began maligning City prior to the match, calling them a small team with a small team mentality. Hughes responded in kind, although I am of the opinion that Sir Alex opens his mouth too frequently and deserves rebuke. This set the stage for further tension prior to the game, though you might get the feeling that this is more of a personal issue for the managers and for some of the players. I find all this quite immature. There is really no reason for it to become so personal unless you are a supporter. Even after the match, Sir Alex called Carlos Tevez' performance at United into question. There is no place for someone as accomplished as Sir Alex to act in such a fashion.
On the pitch as well, things bordered on parody. There were fouls that indicated a level of frustration for both sides. City felt the usual pressure any team faces while at Old Trafford. United was confronted with a much more impressive City than they had anticipated.
Then there was the bizarre incident of a supporter rushing the pitch and having an altercation with perennial complainer/winger and West Ham reject Craig "I have No Neck" Bellamy. I do not need to explain how stupid this is, although I must admit I did not see the incident while watching the match.
Finally, there is the curious case of the seven minute injury time. Why so much was added I cannot say - there were no major injuries during the second half, and even the substitutions cannot account for this lengthy addition. Mark Hughes claims that the fourth official added time for their celebration following their 90th minute equalizer. However, the time added was all that was needed for Man U to again take the lead and ultimately win.
All in all, it was an exciting game. Nevertheless, every part of this ridiculous tale illustrates some of footballs most annoying issues - silly fans, sillier players, childish managers with big mouths, and questionable officiating. I dislike both of these teams, but what should have been an enjoyable match quickly became a complete fiasco.
This was a game worth waking up for. Man U have a long history and are attempting to capture yet another championship under Sir Alex Ferguson. Man City are a recently wealthy team who have been acquiring great players and working their way towards the top four. Naturally, as rivals from the same city, you could imagine how much this game meant to both sides.
But of course, the entire match became a spectacle. It must be said though, that this began weeks ago when the managers of both teams began exchanging barbs. Sir Alex, as we've all come to expect, began maligning City prior to the match, calling them a small team with a small team mentality. Hughes responded in kind, although I am of the opinion that Sir Alex opens his mouth too frequently and deserves rebuke. This set the stage for further tension prior to the game, though you might get the feeling that this is more of a personal issue for the managers and for some of the players. I find all this quite immature. There is really no reason for it to become so personal unless you are a supporter. Even after the match, Sir Alex called Carlos Tevez' performance at United into question. There is no place for someone as accomplished as Sir Alex to act in such a fashion.
On the pitch as well, things bordered on parody. There were fouls that indicated a level of frustration for both sides. City felt the usual pressure any team faces while at Old Trafford. United was confronted with a much more impressive City than they had anticipated.
Then there was the bizarre incident of a supporter rushing the pitch and having an altercation with perennial complainer/winger and West Ham reject Craig "I have No Neck" Bellamy. I do not need to explain how stupid this is, although I must admit I did not see the incident while watching the match.
Finally, there is the curious case of the seven minute injury time. Why so much was added I cannot say - there were no major injuries during the second half, and even the substitutions cannot account for this lengthy addition. Mark Hughes claims that the fourth official added time for their celebration following their 90th minute equalizer. However, the time added was all that was needed for Man U to again take the lead and ultimately win.
All in all, it was an exciting game. Nevertheless, every part of this ridiculous tale illustrates some of footballs most annoying issues - silly fans, sillier players, childish managers with big mouths, and questionable officiating. I dislike both of these teams, but what should have been an enjoyable match quickly became a complete fiasco.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Fortune's Always HIding...
It really stings that we lost again, but that's how it goes. We actually played pretty well against Liverpool, but just not well enough.
I sincerely hope that Zola can put us back on track. There simply is no reason why we shouldn't be a competitive team.
It wouldn't be our West Ham if we weren't being disappointed, I suppose.
I sincerely hope that Zola can put us back on track. There simply is no reason why we shouldn't be a competitive team.
It wouldn't be our West Ham if we weren't being disappointed, I suppose.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
The Football Community
Although I've discussed the difficulty with which one follow the Premier League in the US, there are sometimes aspects of being in the minority which are quite nice.
Following a few Sunday games, I spent my day having drinks with some fellow football fanatics. Represented among us were Man U, Chelsea, Aston Villa, and of course, West Ham. It was great not only getting to know some of these other supporters, but in getting to have a drink with like minded people.
In England, as with much of the world, the scene from our local Premier League bar could never exist - supporters from a variety of sides, drinking together, laughing together, and watching hours of football without incident. Because of the scarcity of opportunities and locales at which to view our game, people who might otherwise brutalize each other act as friends. It's all very heartwarming.
As we stood there discussing different venues where Premier League is shown, I realized that we have an invaluable community here in Austin. All the difficulty we might normally have seeing the sport of our choice is partially alleviated by the fact that we have bonded together in many ways. I'll always laugh at the plight of someones team, especially Chelsea, when they lose, but part of me always likes how we seem to get along.
Following a few Sunday games, I spent my day having drinks with some fellow football fanatics. Represented among us were Man U, Chelsea, Aston Villa, and of course, West Ham. It was great not only getting to know some of these other supporters, but in getting to have a drink with like minded people.
In England, as with much of the world, the scene from our local Premier League bar could never exist - supporters from a variety of sides, drinking together, laughing together, and watching hours of football without incident. Because of the scarcity of opportunities and locales at which to view our game, people who might otherwise brutalize each other act as friends. It's all very heartwarming.
As we stood there discussing different venues where Premier League is shown, I realized that we have an invaluable community here in Austin. All the difficulty we might normally have seeing the sport of our choice is partially alleviated by the fact that we have bonded together in many ways. I'll always laugh at the plight of someones team, especially Chelsea, when they lose, but part of me always likes how we seem to get along.
Homegrown Talent Rules - A Blessing for Mid-Table Teams
Of course Arsene Wenger and Rafa Benitez are opposed, but the Premier Leagues decision to force teams to have at least 8 homegrown players out of their 25 total has been agreed upon.
This will benefit teams like West Ham, for instance, who have a solid youth academy and a tradition of fielding many English or Welsh players.
This will be a problem for teams like Arsenal and Liverpool, as well as others. It is often difficult to pinpoint even ONE English player with some of these teams.
I'm not opposed to foreign players in the least. But I think it would be great for teams to look for talent a little closer to home. Perhaps the secret to a World Cup winning English side is the development of young, domestic players.
This will benefit teams like West Ham, for instance, who have a solid youth academy and a tradition of fielding many English or Welsh players.
This will be a problem for teams like Arsenal and Liverpool, as well as others. It is often difficult to pinpoint even ONE English player with some of these teams.
I'm not opposed to foreign players in the least. But I think it would be great for teams to look for talent a little closer to home. Perhaps the secret to a World Cup winning English side is the development of young, domestic players.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Russell Brand
I can't stand Jimmy Fallon, but this interview is quite funny.
The West Ham discussion starts at 7:30.
This helped to cheer me up after our loss to Wigan today.
The West Ham discussion starts at 7:30.
This helped to cheer me up after our loss to Wigan today.
Friday, September 11, 2009
It's Official: Diego Maradona sucks
Many people, like me, hate Diego Maradona because he is a cheater and all-round scumbag. But you have to wonder how much of a hero he will be to the Argentinians when their national team fails to qualify for the World Cup finals in South Africa next summer. Apparently being a legend does not always mean you'll be a satisfactory manager. One article I read said that there is a reluctance in the Argentine sports press to criticize this god of football. But if anyone needs to be criticized, let alone fired, it's him!
What really boggles the mind is how with the team he has, he still can't guarantee a qualification!
What really boggles the mind is how with the team he has, he still can't guarantee a qualification!
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The West Ham - Millwall Debacle
While you were busy putting together your NFL fantasy football team, you might have missed what many in Britain could not stop talking about. I am, of course, talking about the riot that occurred outside, and to some degree, inside of Upton Park during their Carling Cup match against Millwall FC. A few weeks have passed, and the dust seems to have settled, which means we can all look at this with some perspective.
For those of you who need it, here is some background information that will help you to understand the severity of what happened on the 25th of August.
West Ham was drawn lottery-style to play against arch-rivals Millwall in the first round of the Carling Cup, a multi-league competition. On the night in question, organized groups of hooligans, known as firms, made plans to attack one another in the vicinity of the game. While the game was being played inside, there was carnage on the streets, culminating in brawls, projectiles being hurled at opposing supporters and police, and even a stabbing. This sort of behavior used to occur quite frequently in the heyday of football hooliganism, a period from the end of the 60s until the end of the 80s, which made this very public display of violence so shocking. Less shocking, but more idiotic, was the minor pitch invasion at the hands of several dozen West Ham supporters. (Reader comments attached to some media reports have indicated that true hooligans would never do something so blatant for fear of being caught. A number of the people on the pitch were wearing West Ham colors and had many were photographed - surefire ways to be identified.)
Of course, football violence in Britain never really disappeared. Firms began to fight each other in agreed upon locations away from stadia, as to avoid lifetime bans from matches as well as increasingly punitive measures that had been enacted over time. While the infamous firms have never fully gone away, it is something of a surprise that such blatant and open aggression would surface on the streets of London in this day and age. Nevertheless, as we sat and listened to Sky Sports recount the events of the day, we were stunned - but only slightly. After all, the moment I learned that the Irons had drawn against their oldest and fiercest rivals, I immediately considered the obvious implications.
The bitter rivalry has its roots in a time when teams often represented the company or profession from which its early players were chosen. In the case of these two teams, they represented competing ironworks on opposite sides of the Thames. When the employees of the Thames Iron Works, West Hams original incarnation, went on strike, there was immediate ill will towards the employees of the company from which Millwall was born, as they did follow suit. The rivalry also exists, to some degree, because these two parts of London are traditionally poorer, working-class neighborhoods. The very identity of those who live in such depressed areas has therefore been strengthened around their respective teams.
Furthermore, this should not have been treated as quite as much of a shock as it was in the media, given that the teams had not played each other in five years. This pent up desire to trounce one's greatest enemy must only have been heightened by the long wait between games. It should also be said that Millwall, although currently two leagues below West Ham, has a record of upsetting the Hammers. It is the very nature of both the Carling and FA cups that smaller, lesser known teams can sometimes embarrass squads from the Premiership.
The reaction could not have been more one-sided. Initial reports on Sky Sports indicated that Millwall supporters had planned attacks at nearby Tube stations. But the sheer numbers of West Ham supporters present, common for a home game, created a situation where Millwall supporters found themselves outnumbered. The poor decisions made by supporters within the grounds also made it seem as if West Ham and their supporters were entirely responsible for what happened. Both teams are generally looked down upon, but the reaction against West Ham in the press was disproportionate. There were a number of people calling for a grounds closure, whereby West Ham would play a number of games behind closed doors - a crude and ineffective group punishment unlikely to dissuade the minority of supporters involved.
Some called for West Ham to have points deducted from their standings in the Premiership. This sort of punishment can cripple a team, and is entirely unfair since the game was a Carling Cup match, not a Premier League event. It should be stated that fewer people called for a deduction of Millwalls points, which, despite being less one-sided, is still unfair and ludicrous.
Former West Ham player and manager, and current Tottenham manager, Harry Redknapp, made the most logical suggestion, but one that defies the lottery system of match-ups. He recommended that the teams never be allowed to play one another ever again. Should they ever be drawn at random again, they should both be placed back into the pool and drawn against other teams. This is fair minded as it attacks the problem at its source - crazed fans. However, this would not rid football of violence associated with other rivalries, nor would it negate the potential for trouble should Millwall ever ascend to the Premier League.
A number of journalists declared this a return to the "bad old days" of rampant hooliganism, but one must consider that policing is more effective, punishments have become more severe, and the problem of violence, although ever-present, has declined over time. But the reaction towards West Ham, as well as towards Millwall, is really beyond belief. I hate to have to defend Millwall, but would this have been the reaction if Chelsea fans had invaded the pitch, or if Blackburn supporters had thrown rocks at the police? I seriously doubt it.
Sadly, West Hams hard-earned victory over a surprisingly strong Millwall side was completely forgotten in the discussion altogether. By far the most touching moment, though, came at the end of the match. Jack Collison, whose father had been killed only days earlier en route to see his son play against Tottenham, (another rival, by the way,) left the field in tears. He was visibly upset, not only for his tremendous loss, but from the chaos of the evening in general. He, like just about all of our players, had been urging the wayward supporters back to the stands, proving that he is a player of exceptional integrity. Although this whole affair has been very disheartening, Collison showed everyone what true courage and class really is. Our thoughts remain with him in this extremely tough time.
If you are interested in reading more, take a look at some of these links:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1209050/West-Ham-fans-face-life-bans-hundreds-bloody-rampage-night-shame-Millwall-Upton-Park.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8221626.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/westham/6093066/Violence-at-West-Ham-v-Millwall-a-disgrace-says-Sports-Minister-Gerry-Sutcliffe.html
http://westhamprocess.com/2009/08/26/jack-collison-a-true-west-ham-hero/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1209062/West-Ham-3-Millwall-1-AET--Thats-worst-Ive-seen-says-Gianfranco-Zola.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8223000/8223844.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/26/west-ham-millwall-violence-punishments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/westham/6097814/West-Ham-and-Millwall-should-never-play-again-says-Harry-Redknapp.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/david-conn-inside-sport-blog/2009/aug/26/west-ham-millwall-hooliganism-history-violence
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2009/aug/30/football-violence-west-ham-millwall-carling-cup
For those of you who need it, here is some background information that will help you to understand the severity of what happened on the 25th of August.
West Ham was drawn lottery-style to play against arch-rivals Millwall in the first round of the Carling Cup, a multi-league competition. On the night in question, organized groups of hooligans, known as firms, made plans to attack one another in the vicinity of the game. While the game was being played inside, there was carnage on the streets, culminating in brawls, projectiles being hurled at opposing supporters and police, and even a stabbing. This sort of behavior used to occur quite frequently in the heyday of football hooliganism, a period from the end of the 60s until the end of the 80s, which made this very public display of violence so shocking. Less shocking, but more idiotic, was the minor pitch invasion at the hands of several dozen West Ham supporters. (Reader comments attached to some media reports have indicated that true hooligans would never do something so blatant for fear of being caught. A number of the people on the pitch were wearing West Ham colors and had many were photographed - surefire ways to be identified.)
Of course, football violence in Britain never really disappeared. Firms began to fight each other in agreed upon locations away from stadia, as to avoid lifetime bans from matches as well as increasingly punitive measures that had been enacted over time. While the infamous firms have never fully gone away, it is something of a surprise that such blatant and open aggression would surface on the streets of London in this day and age. Nevertheless, as we sat and listened to Sky Sports recount the events of the day, we were stunned - but only slightly. After all, the moment I learned that the Irons had drawn against their oldest and fiercest rivals, I immediately considered the obvious implications.
The bitter rivalry has its roots in a time when teams often represented the company or profession from which its early players were chosen. In the case of these two teams, they represented competing ironworks on opposite sides of the Thames. When the employees of the Thames Iron Works, West Hams original incarnation, went on strike, there was immediate ill will towards the employees of the company from which Millwall was born, as they did follow suit. The rivalry also exists, to some degree, because these two parts of London are traditionally poorer, working-class neighborhoods. The very identity of those who live in such depressed areas has therefore been strengthened around their respective teams.
Furthermore, this should not have been treated as quite as much of a shock as it was in the media, given that the teams had not played each other in five years. This pent up desire to trounce one's greatest enemy must only have been heightened by the long wait between games. It should also be said that Millwall, although currently two leagues below West Ham, has a record of upsetting the Hammers. It is the very nature of both the Carling and FA cups that smaller, lesser known teams can sometimes embarrass squads from the Premiership.
The reaction could not have been more one-sided. Initial reports on Sky Sports indicated that Millwall supporters had planned attacks at nearby Tube stations. But the sheer numbers of West Ham supporters present, common for a home game, created a situation where Millwall supporters found themselves outnumbered. The poor decisions made by supporters within the grounds also made it seem as if West Ham and their supporters were entirely responsible for what happened. Both teams are generally looked down upon, but the reaction against West Ham in the press was disproportionate. There were a number of people calling for a grounds closure, whereby West Ham would play a number of games behind closed doors - a crude and ineffective group punishment unlikely to dissuade the minority of supporters involved.
Some called for West Ham to have points deducted from their standings in the Premiership. This sort of punishment can cripple a team, and is entirely unfair since the game was a Carling Cup match, not a Premier League event. It should be stated that fewer people called for a deduction of Millwalls points, which, despite being less one-sided, is still unfair and ludicrous.
Former West Ham player and manager, and current Tottenham manager, Harry Redknapp, made the most logical suggestion, but one that defies the lottery system of match-ups. He recommended that the teams never be allowed to play one another ever again. Should they ever be drawn at random again, they should both be placed back into the pool and drawn against other teams. This is fair minded as it attacks the problem at its source - crazed fans. However, this would not rid football of violence associated with other rivalries, nor would it negate the potential for trouble should Millwall ever ascend to the Premier League.
A number of journalists declared this a return to the "bad old days" of rampant hooliganism, but one must consider that policing is more effective, punishments have become more severe, and the problem of violence, although ever-present, has declined over time. But the reaction towards West Ham, as well as towards Millwall, is really beyond belief. I hate to have to defend Millwall, but would this have been the reaction if Chelsea fans had invaded the pitch, or if Blackburn supporters had thrown rocks at the police? I seriously doubt it.
Sadly, West Hams hard-earned victory over a surprisingly strong Millwall side was completely forgotten in the discussion altogether. By far the most touching moment, though, came at the end of the match. Jack Collison, whose father had been killed only days earlier en route to see his son play against Tottenham, (another rival, by the way,) left the field in tears. He was visibly upset, not only for his tremendous loss, but from the chaos of the evening in general. He, like just about all of our players, had been urging the wayward supporters back to the stands, proving that he is a player of exceptional integrity. Although this whole affair has been very disheartening, Collison showed everyone what true courage and class really is. Our thoughts remain with him in this extremely tough time.
If you are interested in reading more, take a look at some of these links:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1209050/West-Ham-fans-face-life-bans-hundreds-bloody-rampage-night-shame-Millwall-Upton-Park.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8221626.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/westham/6093066/Violence-at-West-Ham-v-Millwall-a-disgrace-says-Sports-Minister-Gerry-Sutcliffe.html
http://westhamprocess.com/2009/08/26/jack-collison-a-true-west-ham-hero/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1209062/West-Ham-3-Millwall-1-AET--Thats-worst-Ive-seen-says-Gianfranco-Zola.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8223000/8223844.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/26/west-ham-millwall-violence-punishments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/westham/6097814/West-Ham-and-Millwall-should-never-play-again-says-Harry-Redknapp.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/david-conn-inside-sport-blog/2009/aug/26/west-ham-millwall-hooliganism-history-violence
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2009/aug/30/football-violence-west-ham-millwall-carling-cup
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Jam of the Week
Handicap - Upsetter All Stars
A different take on Lee Perry's "People Funny Boy," which has been sampled/replayed many times as other songs (for instance, "Longshot" by the Pioneers). This one is awesome for a lot of reasons, including the Steel Drum.
A different take on Lee Perry's "People Funny Boy," which has been sampled/replayed many times as other songs (for instance, "Longshot" by the Pioneers). This one is awesome for a lot of reasons, including the Steel Drum.
Apostrophes?
Bonus points to anyone willing to teach me how to correctly use apostrophes. Plural, belonging to, etc... I find this all a little confusing.
Help me out, English majors!
Send grammatical assistance to:
sat.morning.fever@gmail.com
Help me out, English majors!
Send grammatical assistance to:
sat.morning.fever@gmail.com
USA 2 - El Salvador 1
In a moderately impressive showing, the US national team beat El Salvador 2 to 1 on Saturday evening. Although I do not believe our third goal should have been disallowed, we played quite well, and for a brief moment, we were at the top of our qualifying group.
Mexico managed to get themselves together and are now barely trailing behind us, while Costa Rica, who had quite a lead until Saturday, have slipped into the non-qualifying part of the table.
I believe the US will qualify, but unless we see a performance reminiscent of this last summers Confederations Cup, we won't last long in South Africa.
Mexico managed to get themselves together and are now barely trailing behind us, while Costa Rica, who had quite a lead until Saturday, have slipped into the non-qualifying part of the table.
I believe the US will qualify, but unless we see a performance reminiscent of this last summers Confederations Cup, we won't last long in South Africa.
Womens Football
Like most men, I tend to regard womens sports as inferior. Before you react to that statement, either with agreement or complete opposition, allow me to clarify. What I mean, is that when comparing a professional sport traditionally played by, as well as dominated by, men, I am more interested in the mens version. When it comes to Softball, Volleyball, Gymnastics, and a number of other athletic events, womens sports seem just as exciting and competitive.
Now, I don't believe I am being sexist. Men can generally run faster, tend to be stronger, and have a longer history of competing in athletic events. It is usually more exciting to watch mens sports of all varieties. I am hesitant to say that one gender is supposed to play one sport and another is supposed to play something else - I truly don't believe that. Nevertheless, when it comes to just about any sport, I find womens sports a little boring.
Unsurprisingly, there is one exception to how I feel.
You guessed it - Soccer. Although I will never find any league, mens or womens, that can ever draw my attention away from the English Premier League, womens football does come close.
In England, there is a Womens Premier League which runs concurrently alongside the mens league. Although Arsenal appears to have dominated this league over the years, there are teams that mirror their mens counterparts for just about every imaginable football club. Although I am privy only to highlights care of Sky Sports, I have been impressed with what I've seen.
Similarly, there are UEFA competitions that represent all of Europes womens leagues. And there is a womens World Cup. In fact, while the US mens team struggles for worldwide recognition in the world of football, our Womens team has won twice! We have a better record than Brazil!
There are a number of reasons for this. Soccer has been a popular youth sport in the US for some time, but we lack a system of academies or training beyond that of academic institutions. This means we can't seem to get our shit together when it comes to having a quality professional league or successful national team. On the flipside, it means that we have been cultivating a lot of otherwise forgotten talent - that of our girls and young women. The US has long been a nation where women have played sports. Soccer is a sport that has particularly resonated with our women, and the results speak for themselves. The fledgling WPS does not look set to overtake the MLS or any other league in popularity, but the quality of play is, in my opinion, comparable.
In short, although I seem like a sexist asshole, I have actually watched womens soccer. It is entertaining and exciting. If given the chance to watch the West Ham womens team, I absolutely would. And if you doubt what I say, I recommend watching a WPS game some time. The names of the teams leave a lot to be desired, but the players are quick, skilled, and most importantly, passionate.
Now, I don't believe I am being sexist. Men can generally run faster, tend to be stronger, and have a longer history of competing in athletic events. It is usually more exciting to watch mens sports of all varieties. I am hesitant to say that one gender is supposed to play one sport and another is supposed to play something else - I truly don't believe that. Nevertheless, when it comes to just about any sport, I find womens sports a little boring.
Unsurprisingly, there is one exception to how I feel.
You guessed it - Soccer. Although I will never find any league, mens or womens, that can ever draw my attention away from the English Premier League, womens football does come close.
In England, there is a Womens Premier League which runs concurrently alongside the mens league. Although Arsenal appears to have dominated this league over the years, there are teams that mirror their mens counterparts for just about every imaginable football club. Although I am privy only to highlights care of Sky Sports, I have been impressed with what I've seen.
Similarly, there are UEFA competitions that represent all of Europes womens leagues. And there is a womens World Cup. In fact, while the US mens team struggles for worldwide recognition in the world of football, our Womens team has won twice! We have a better record than Brazil!
There are a number of reasons for this. Soccer has been a popular youth sport in the US for some time, but we lack a system of academies or training beyond that of academic institutions. This means we can't seem to get our shit together when it comes to having a quality professional league or successful national team. On the flipside, it means that we have been cultivating a lot of otherwise forgotten talent - that of our girls and young women. The US has long been a nation where women have played sports. Soccer is a sport that has particularly resonated with our women, and the results speak for themselves. The fledgling WPS does not look set to overtake the MLS or any other league in popularity, but the quality of play is, in my opinion, comparable.
In short, although I seem like a sexist asshole, I have actually watched womens soccer. It is entertaining and exciting. If given the chance to watch the West Ham womens team, I absolutely would. And if you doubt what I say, I recommend watching a WPS game some time. The names of the teams leave a lot to be desired, but the players are quick, skilled, and most importantly, passionate.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
International Break
Due to a number of World Cup qualifiers and friendlies, there are no Premier League matches this week.
However, the US does take on El Salvador, which should be great. It has been exciting to watch the US get better and better at a sport considered by most in America to be foreign. Hopefully they will continue to improve and have a more impressive showing in the World Cup next summer than in years past.
Just to give a preview of upcoming posts:
More on the US National Team
My take on the MLS and the USL - Americas domestic soccer leagues
Thoughts on the West Ham - Millwall debacle
and finally,
The issue of money in Football and the aftermath of this summers record spending
Thanks for reading! Please feel free to leave comments!
However, the US does take on El Salvador, which should be great. It has been exciting to watch the US get better and better at a sport considered by most in America to be foreign. Hopefully they will continue to improve and have a more impressive showing in the World Cup next summer than in years past.
Just to give a preview of upcoming posts:
More on the US National Team
My take on the MLS and the USL - Americas domestic soccer leagues
Thoughts on the West Ham - Millwall debacle
and finally,
The issue of money in Football and the aftermath of this summers record spending
Thanks for reading! Please feel free to leave comments!
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Jam of the week!
Wilson Pickett: Everybody Needs Somebody to Love
originally by Solomon Burke, this is fucking classic
Slim Harpo: Got Love if You Want It
great blues number
originally by Solomon Burke, this is fucking classic
Slim Harpo: Got Love if You Want It
great blues number
My thoughts on South Africa 2010
Although I am an American, I am also a South African, insofar as I was born there. I have been to visit several times, and as a result, I have seen South Africa return to the world of international sports following the end of apartheid. Sporting events mean a lot to the diverse people of South Africa, not just from the perspective of participating in such events, but also because of having the chance to host such events.
South Africa has made multiple bids to host the Olympics in Cape Town, of which none were a success. Although they have hosted plural Rugby and Cricket competitions, these do not attract the kind of international excitement followers of such sports may believe they do.
It should be no surprise, then, that South Africa was elated to have been chosen to host the 2010 World Cup finals after a number of attempts. This has excited many beyond belief, as this is not only something for South Africa to proud of, but for the continent as a whole, since this will be the first time the Mundial has been set in Africa.
This means so much to South Africa for a lot reasons. Aside from the aforementioned return to the world stage post-apartheid, it would be a huge boost for the tourism industry, and a chance for an extremely beautiful country to showcase all of its positive aspects.
That being said, there still looms the threat of a FIFA intervention which could result in a move to a new location. I have heard that if things are not to FIFAs liking by December, the Cup could be moved to a country whose infrastructure is perpetually ready for such events (most countries in Europe and many in South America, as well as the US, for instance.)
South Africa should have a lot to worry about. Crime is a major issue, if not THE issue. There were numerous cases of robbery, muggings, police extortion, theft and security issues that foreign travelers, journalists, and even players experienced during this summers Confederations Cup. Imagine, then, what this sort of situation will look like when tens of thousands have traveled to South Africa for the World Cup.
There is also the larger security issue that faces many African nations. Aside for South Africa's own extremists groups (militant Afrikaaners, Islamic extremists,) there is generally a lack of the kind of infrastructure one would hope for given the threat of terrorism (and I don't mean the hysterical, take off your shoes at the airport kind of threat, I mean the real kind of threat.) Between terrorism and crime, these threats could make World Cup '10 a minor catastrophe, if not an outright cataclysm.
One also has to wonder if the building boom related to new stadia will result in well built structures, or potential collapses the likes of which have certainly not been seen in Europe for some time. Contractors may not be building safe places to host games and people may be getting payoffs to look the other way. However, people maybe spared the cruel fate of dying in a collapse if regular strikes by workers hamper the building at these sites any further.
On a more practical level, there is the issue of transportation. South Africa also possesses a poor system when it comes from getting from point A to B. Many of the roads are too small to facilitate such a large influx of tourists all at one time, not to mention that the train system has had a whole gamut of problems itself (and did I mention crime? The trains are a great place to get mugged.)
Of course, I do tend to be pessimistic when it comes to just about everything. South Africa is a country plagued with so many problems, it's hard to be positive about all of this. But it is also possible that this could go very well. South Africa might very well hold the first World Cup with few major problems occurring, and the entire continent would be the better as a result.
I certainly hope it works out that way.
South Africa has made multiple bids to host the Olympics in Cape Town, of which none were a success. Although they have hosted plural Rugby and Cricket competitions, these do not attract the kind of international excitement followers of such sports may believe they do.
It should be no surprise, then, that South Africa was elated to have been chosen to host the 2010 World Cup finals after a number of attempts. This has excited many beyond belief, as this is not only something for South Africa to proud of, but for the continent as a whole, since this will be the first time the Mundial has been set in Africa.
This means so much to South Africa for a lot reasons. Aside from the aforementioned return to the world stage post-apartheid, it would be a huge boost for the tourism industry, and a chance for an extremely beautiful country to showcase all of its positive aspects.
That being said, there still looms the threat of a FIFA intervention which could result in a move to a new location. I have heard that if things are not to FIFAs liking by December, the Cup could be moved to a country whose infrastructure is perpetually ready for such events (most countries in Europe and many in South America, as well as the US, for instance.)
South Africa should have a lot to worry about. Crime is a major issue, if not THE issue. There were numerous cases of robbery, muggings, police extortion, theft and security issues that foreign travelers, journalists, and even players experienced during this summers Confederations Cup. Imagine, then, what this sort of situation will look like when tens of thousands have traveled to South Africa for the World Cup.
There is also the larger security issue that faces many African nations. Aside for South Africa's own extremists groups (militant Afrikaaners, Islamic extremists,) there is generally a lack of the kind of infrastructure one would hope for given the threat of terrorism (and I don't mean the hysterical, take off your shoes at the airport kind of threat, I mean the real kind of threat.) Between terrorism and crime, these threats could make World Cup '10 a minor catastrophe, if not an outright cataclysm.
One also has to wonder if the building boom related to new stadia will result in well built structures, or potential collapses the likes of which have certainly not been seen in Europe for some time. Contractors may not be building safe places to host games and people may be getting payoffs to look the other way. However, people maybe spared the cruel fate of dying in a collapse if regular strikes by workers hamper the building at these sites any further.
On a more practical level, there is the issue of transportation. South Africa also possesses a poor system when it comes from getting from point A to B. Many of the roads are too small to facilitate such a large influx of tourists all at one time, not to mention that the train system has had a whole gamut of problems itself (and did I mention crime? The trains are a great place to get mugged.)
Of course, I do tend to be pessimistic when it comes to just about everything. South Africa is a country plagued with so many problems, it's hard to be positive about all of this. But it is also possible that this could go very well. South Africa might very well hold the first World Cup with few major problems occurring, and the entire continent would be the better as a result.
I certainly hope it works out that way.
You have less than a year to memorize this. Get started.
West Ham? Really?
But... why?
It's a question i'm often asked. Why would someone interested in English football arbitrarily select West Ham United of all teams? For Britons, the question is confounding, as many seem to think the team is obscure, unworthy, or generally marred by a poor reputation, at least as far as fans are concerned. Americans, who love winners and despise a challenge, are puzzled by this choice because West Ham has not truly seen glory days in some time.
So why do I love West Ham? The reasons are numerous.
It would be foolish to discuss this matter without mentioning the fact that Americans who love the Premier League are exactly that; Americans. We're not from East London, West London, Manchester or Liverpool, and it is possible to imagine that many people who follow the Premiership have never even been to England. So how then do people select a team to support?
Some choose teams based on performance, as I mentioned earlier. Some choose their squad based on a place they visited or studied abroad. Others make their decision because of a team their friends like.
This first group is referred to by one of my fellow supporters as people who ride the "glory train", although it could be argued that you may also ride a glory hole. These are people who only want to see a winner. Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, and Arsenal are the teams these people support. It must certainly be comforting to follow any of these sides, as the most heart wrenching thing that can happen to you is finishing in the last place of the Champions League qualifying positions. You will probably not see your side relegated any time soon (sadly,) and even though you will take it upon yourself to complain wildly about some perceived injustice, you will, in fact, always be happy about your team's performance. This, however, instantly qualifies you as an asshole, and allows West Ham supporters everywhere to yell at you as they see fit. If you are in the category of people who studied abroad or lived somewhere in England, this is more acceptable, as is choosing a team based on peer/family bonds.
I chose West Ham in the same way many West Ham supporters across the globe did - because some band that we like also supports them. Punk rock enthusiasts the world over often choose West Ham because of Cock Sparrer, the Business, the Cockney rejects, and a number of other English punk bands. Some of these bands, particularly the Cockney Rejects, made mention of the team in their songs.
I figured, since I love football and always have (one of my earliest memories is watching the World Cup with my dad,) what better team to support than the same one that Cock Sparrer loves? Metalheads sometimes choose West Ham because Iron Maiden is all about them. You can even find Maiden football jerseys with the West Ham crest emblazoned upon them.
There are other reasons to love West Ham. It's a team with a long history. Their rivalry with neighboring Millwall goes back a century or more. Their players graced the 1966 World Cup winning English team, most notably Bobby Moore, considered by many to be West Hams most famous player.
West Ham is also a team that inspires an almost religious devotion from its supporters. There is, in my opinion and from my observations, no such thing as casual or partial support of the Hammers. You either care, to the point of obsession, or you support Man U. There is no middle ground. Even the followers I know who rarely even watch the games still know everything that is going on - scores, transfers, general news and gossip. Knowing how much your fellow Irons love this team only breeds a more fierce commitment, and this remains so even when West Ham faces relegation. I remember it happening, and I remember almost wanting to cry. Ours is a team plagued my mid table finishes, injury prone players, frivolous lawsuits by poorly performing teams (Sheffield United, whose crybaby tactics haven't helped them back into the Pemiership,) and assorted other tragedies - and yet this only makes us more die hard.
I love football, almost too much, some might say. But my love of West Ham knows no bounds. So when people ask why I would support such a team, I tell them the same thing: "listen you scumbag Chelsea supporter, go and fuck yourself!" Although, more realistically, I tell them that this team means more to me than many things on this Earth, and that even though I'm not from East London, I identify with the Hammers in a way I can barely describe. I bleed claret and blue, I dream of the next game I get to see, and even hearing "Bubbles" makes shivers run down my spine.
I love West Ham United. I'm West Ham 'til I die, and I'll be there whether we get relegated to the conference level, or if we finish first place in the Premier League.
Now that's true love.
Cock Sparrer
It's a question i'm often asked. Why would someone interested in English football arbitrarily select West Ham United of all teams? For Britons, the question is confounding, as many seem to think the team is obscure, unworthy, or generally marred by a poor reputation, at least as far as fans are concerned. Americans, who love winners and despise a challenge, are puzzled by this choice because West Ham has not truly seen glory days in some time.
So why do I love West Ham? The reasons are numerous.
It would be foolish to discuss this matter without mentioning the fact that Americans who love the Premier League are exactly that; Americans. We're not from East London, West London, Manchester or Liverpool, and it is possible to imagine that many people who follow the Premiership have never even been to England. So how then do people select a team to support?
Some choose teams based on performance, as I mentioned earlier. Some choose their squad based on a place they visited or studied abroad. Others make their decision because of a team their friends like.
This first group is referred to by one of my fellow supporters as people who ride the "glory train", although it could be argued that you may also ride a glory hole. These are people who only want to see a winner. Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, and Arsenal are the teams these people support. It must certainly be comforting to follow any of these sides, as the most heart wrenching thing that can happen to you is finishing in the last place of the Champions League qualifying positions. You will probably not see your side relegated any time soon (sadly,) and even though you will take it upon yourself to complain wildly about some perceived injustice, you will, in fact, always be happy about your team's performance. This, however, instantly qualifies you as an asshole, and allows West Ham supporters everywhere to yell at you as they see fit. If you are in the category of people who studied abroad or lived somewhere in England, this is more acceptable, as is choosing a team based on peer/family bonds.
I chose West Ham in the same way many West Ham supporters across the globe did - because some band that we like also supports them. Punk rock enthusiasts the world over often choose West Ham because of Cock Sparrer, the Business, the Cockney rejects, and a number of other English punk bands. Some of these bands, particularly the Cockney Rejects, made mention of the team in their songs.
I figured, since I love football and always have (one of my earliest memories is watching the World Cup with my dad,) what better team to support than the same one that Cock Sparrer loves? Metalheads sometimes choose West Ham because Iron Maiden is all about them. You can even find Maiden football jerseys with the West Ham crest emblazoned upon them.
There are other reasons to love West Ham. It's a team with a long history. Their rivalry with neighboring Millwall goes back a century or more. Their players graced the 1966 World Cup winning English team, most notably Bobby Moore, considered by many to be West Hams most famous player.
West Ham is also a team that inspires an almost religious devotion from its supporters. There is, in my opinion and from my observations, no such thing as casual or partial support of the Hammers. You either care, to the point of obsession, or you support Man U. There is no middle ground. Even the followers I know who rarely even watch the games still know everything that is going on - scores, transfers, general news and gossip. Knowing how much your fellow Irons love this team only breeds a more fierce commitment, and this remains so even when West Ham faces relegation. I remember it happening, and I remember almost wanting to cry. Ours is a team plagued my mid table finishes, injury prone players, frivolous lawsuits by poorly performing teams (Sheffield United, whose crybaby tactics haven't helped them back into the Pemiership,) and assorted other tragedies - and yet this only makes us more die hard.
I love football, almost too much, some might say. But my love of West Ham knows no bounds. So when people ask why I would support such a team, I tell them the same thing: "listen you scumbag Chelsea supporter, go and fuck yourself!" Although, more realistically, I tell them that this team means more to me than many things on this Earth, and that even though I'm not from East London, I identify with the Hammers in a way I can barely describe. I bleed claret and blue, I dream of the next game I get to see, and even hearing "Bubbles" makes shivers run down my spine.
I love West Ham United. I'm West Ham 'til I die, and I'll be there whether we get relegated to the conference level, or if we finish first place in the Premier League.
Now that's true love.
Cock Sparrer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
